How Islam treats the women

  How Islam treats the women

Women's bodies have always been part of the terrain of conflict

In ancient India, women enjoyed equal status with men in major fields of life and received the same education and rights as men. Many tribes and communities, like the Nairs in Kerala and the Khasis and Garos in Meghalaya, were even matrilineal, where women held sway. Even in patriarchal Hindu societies, women in ancient India were powerful and widely respected.

However, during the medieval period, the status of women went down considerably after the Islamic invasions. The latter brought regressive changes to Hindu society. Jauhar became a prevalent custom among the Hindus, chiefly the Rajputs. It was performed when the women faced Islamic invaders to avoid being tortured, enslaved, and losing their honour. After every conquest by Bin Qasim, and Mahmud Ghaznawi till the attack of Abdali, ordinary women were regularly incarcerated and sold in Central Asian slave markets, while royal and other beautiful women were sent to Caliphs in Baghdad as gifts. Like other treasures of the loot, the rest were distributed among the ministers, commanders, higher officers, and even the *hoi polloi*.

To avoid such barbaric treatment, as soon as it was clear that Hindu defeat was inevitable when their husbands had been killed, the women used to make preparations to commit *jauhar*. The latter was certainly considered a more dignified way of ending life. There were instances where women jumped into the fire after seeing the invaders approaching. They were extracted from the fire half-burnt and treated for the burns. After recovery, they were raped and packed off to the slave markets.

Islamic invaders primarily treated sexual abuse as a deliberate military strategy and not just a by-product of war. Women were primarily seen as the community's repositories, reproducers, and caregivers worldwide. Violating and polluting them was treated as the inherent right of the victorious, as the goal was to subjugate the vanquished in the most degrading manner. It was thought of as a convenient and effective tool for social and cultural suppression. Sexual violation of women erodes the fabric of a community in a way few weapons can. It was also used to destabilise and sow terror in the rival communities. Another motive for this monstrous act was to contaminate the hereditary line by impregnating the women of the enemy kingdom.

Since ancient times, women have always been considered a significant part of the spoils of war, a mere chattel in a brutal system. However, there is no such evidence of the degrading institutionalised practice anywhere in India. The closest incident was an attempt to disrobe Draupadi in the epic Mahabharata.

It is manifested in the example of Fath-Ali Shah Qajar, the second Shah of Persia, in the 18th century. When he attacked Qafqaz (in present-day Azerbaijan), his army cut the veins of their thighs after violating the women, leaving them forever handicapped. The limp of the women would give away their traumatic past, ostracizing them eternally. Even by Islamic standards, Fath-Ali Shah was considered a very colourful personality. He had more than 1,000 spouses, with 130 sons and 150 daughters. When he died, his descendants numbered a massive 5,000.

However, it was not an extraordinary example to cite, and unfortunately, history is full of such horrific tragedies. These incidents continue to happen even to this date. The genesis of such harsh treatment was that early Muslims were keenly aware that enslaved women could increase the Muslim population by leaps and bounds when captured in large numbers, as it was their main aim in the first place. For this purpose, men were allowed four legal wives at any point, discounting divorces with halala thrown in as a bonus to enable multifold progeny. Besides, they were also entitled to have as many slave girls or concubines as they pleased. For men, there was absolute freedom from all inhibitions and reservations in matters of sex. This very fact of getting unbridled sex sent many non-Muslim males salivating at the doors of Islam.

T.P. Hughes contends in his book "Dictionary of Islam" (1885) that:

*There is absolutely no limit to the number of slave girls with whom a Muhammadan may cohabit, and it is the consecration of this illimitable indulgence which so popularizes the Muhammadan religion amongst uncivilized nations, and so popularizes slavery in the Muslim religion.*

Instant triple talaq *(talaq-e-bidat*) was also conceived to have the maximum number of Muslim offspring; hence, men were encouraged to impregnate as many women as possible. When Arabs were conquering new territories every day, they brought thousands of women with them. So, to accommodate these women in the Arab ecosystem, old wives were given divorce by instant triple talaq, and new women were taken as wives.

Rape is identified as the most intrusive of traumatic events by psychologists. The very phenomenon was always put to effective use by the invaders. DS Margoliouth writes in his book "Mohammed and the Rise of Islam" (2010):

*Victory over an enemy would seem to have been consummated only when the enemy's daughter was introduced into the conqueror's harem.*

Muslim women are the worst sufferers among the women of all major religions. Verse 4:34 of the Quran is often cited as the main reason by which men have complete control over their wives and other females in the family. The verse is now nicknamed the *DNA of patriarchy* in Islam as it makes strong distinctions between men and women and confers on men substantially more rights than those available to women. A Muslim man inherits twice that of the female and he is given full right to divorce his wife unilaterally. Prevalence of polygamy, enforcement of the veil, unequal divorce rights, and inadequate property rights are designed to put down Muslim women as the inferior sex. Shahla Haeri, in her book, “Law of desire: temporary marriage in Shi'i Iran” stated the abysmally low position of women in Islamic society (1989).

*Sexual intercourse with one's own slave girl continued to be legitimate until recently in most Islamic societies. Slave ownership should not be confused with slave marriage. Slave marriage involves marriage of a slave with another person, with the permission of the slave master. Marriage is not necessary between a male slave owner and his female slaves. His ownership entitles him to a right of intercourse, hence rape is promoted in Islam.*

It was a principle practised ardently by the Muslim invaders and rulers of India. They habitually used it to cart off the Hindu women as slaves (men, too) to Central Asia and Persia. In ordinary life, in response to violent invasions, deterioration in the condition of Hindu women resulted in the emergence of child marriage, seclusion, denial of education, property and inheritance rights, the preponderance of Sati, and degradation of widowhood. India slid towards a severe form of patriarchy in which several restrictions were placed on women's bodies, activities, and legal, social and economic rights.

While earlier in ancient India, she basked in her identity; in the medieval era, she was abjectly reduced to someone's mother, sister or daughter.